This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article was created or improved during the #1day1woman initiative hosted by the Women in Red project in 2020. The editor(s) involved may be new; please assume good faith regarding their contributions before making changes.Women in RedWikipedia:WikiProject Women in RedTemplate:WikiProject Women in RedWomen in Red articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Barack Obama, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Barack ObamaWikipedia:WikiProject Barack ObamaTemplate:WikiProject Barack ObamaBarack Obama articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
Rosa Gumataotao Rios is within the scope of WikiProject Joe Biden, a project dedicated to creating and improving content related to Joe Biden. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Joe BidenWikipedia:WikiProject Joe BidenTemplate:WikiProject Joe BidenJoe Biden articles
Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
I have updated the article with as many public sources as I could find and, more importantly, structured a template to input additional information as it becomes available; it will still need some general tweaking, especially in the area of current events. Hopefully, that will do for now to at least get it out of the "stub" class.The Original Historygeek (talk) 22:02, 9 August 2009 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 14 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion
I reverted the edit that took out her husband's full name as it was without merit (or comment)- especially given the public sources included in the article which also list his full name. I removed the use of his first name later in the section (as was done in the original edit that I reverted) since it was not needed and too familiar for a biographical article anyway. I left the edit concerning her residence in Fremont first, then Castro Valley stand as it appears to be correct despite the Somos Primos article which clearly states the reverse. The rest of the sources, and even the employment chronology in the SP article support the edit. The SP article is also wrong concerning her father (which it confuses with her husband and also gets the ethnicity wrong) and should probably be removed altogether. Other sources already in the article can be used to take up the slack). The Original Historygeek (talk) 15:32, 14 September 2009 (UTC)Reply
Seems completely bias and one sided. —Preceding unsigned comment added by User:137.150.48.89 21:36, 12 April 2010 (UTC)Reply
I moved the above anonymous comment made today to the bottom of this page since it was originally misplaced at the top, above the banner. As to its merit, it would be nice to know what problem the commenter has so that it can be worked on.The Original Historygeek (talk) 03:04, 13 April 2010 (UTC)Reply
.svg)
.jpg){kind=small}