Wrong facts edit

I've been trying to edit this page's contents but somehow someone keeps insisting on the obviously wrong facts. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.163.208.50 (talk) 03:07, 6 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Dispution regarding it's an expressway edit

I just want to dispute this stated article. I live in Pampanga and I know that there is a Roman Super Highway, but I never knew that it was a tollroad I just went there last month and in its current state I don't think it can be considered an expressway. Due to the following reasons.

1. It is not managed by the Tollways Management Corporation 2. There are no 8 lanes of traffic. There are only two 3. It is not in a condition which can be categorized as an expressway, it is even in a state worse than roads in far flung provinces 4. There are no exit and entry ramps 5. there are no toll plazas.

And kindly give us sources of the said articles you didn't put links to your sources I even checked out the tollways management Corporation site.

This article mis-leads a lot of people.

I think this article should require a clean-up. But as far as I know, this road was constructed by the Marcos Government to served as a dedicated expressway to the Bataan Economic Zone. But soon after it was built people then started to build houses and establishments on its side, thus destroying its real purposeAkosikupal (talk) 07:15, 30 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Since we got the Philippine highway network that has a route numbers assigned by DPWH, I prove that it is not an expressway at all, since the highway is assigned as just the national highway—being numbered N301. Dingo1234555 (talk) 19:44, 11 June 2017 (UTC)Reply
I already moved the page to Roman Superhighway to prevent confusions. I also did some cleanups regarding the intersections (or the so-called "exits") but it needs MORE revisions and clarifications. --hueman1 (talk) 08:33, 12 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bataan Provincial Expressway. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:58, 28 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 16:37, 18 February 2022 (UTC)Reply