Talk:Roland Jupiter-6
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Fair use rationale for Image:RolandJupiter6.jpg edit
Image:RolandJupiter6.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 07:38, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
Notable users edit
What's so notable about these users? Wikipedia is not a soapbox or vehicle for self promotion. While some of those users might be notable, others should be removed. Also , you might want to put WHY they are notable in their use of the Six. ALSO, some are users of the 8, not the 6, like Duran Duran. You might want to link to articles (dig up some old Keyboard Magazines!!! or Roland Users Group magazines!!!) and cite those as sources. If you don't know how to make a proper academic citation, just type the Magazine, Date, Page number, and Article author into the wikipedia main article. Someone will fix it up later. But it's better than no source!!!! Jdubowsky (talk) 04:41, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
-- removing nick rhodes Infindebula (talk) 00:18, 4 May 2010 (UTC)