This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Latest comment: 16 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
I am not sure how hard this article pushes his influence in Britains tactics in Northern Ireland or Americas in Iraq. It seems to imply large scale torture is considered a legitimate tactic by those armies. This looks to me like POV. 145.253.108.22 10:45, 27 February 2007 (UTC)Reply
I agree. The only connection between this work and at least the US war in Iraq is that it is available at the US Command and General Staff College, but so is a whole lot of other stuff. What proof does the writer have that 1) the US or British are applying lessons from this, or 2) if they are, that they are using torture. One of the big lessons of Algeria is that torture does you more harm than good. I'd also like the statement retracted or changed significantly. PowerPointSamurai 03:21, 8 June 2007 (UTC)Reply