This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spain, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Spain on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpainWikipedia:WikiProject SpainTemplate:WikiProject SpainSpain articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Tambayan Philippines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics related to the Philippines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Tambayan PhilippinesWikipedia:WikiProject Tambayan PhilippinesTemplate:WikiProject Tambayan PhilippinesPhilippine-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mexico, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Mexico on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MexicoWikipedia:WikiProject MexicoTemplate:WikiProject MexicoMexico articles
Latest comment: 12 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
The author of the original article on Rodrigo de Vivero y Velasco has confused this person with his son, Rodrigo de Vivero y Aberrucia. Apparently the article was originally written in English, and the mistake propagated to other languages. Please help correct this mistake in the other languages. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Historiador12345 (talk • contribs) 03:57, 16 August 2010 (UTC)Reply
Agreed. I've moved the link to the Japanese article to the appropriate page. The Japanes article appears accurate. Boneyard90 (talk) 22:48, 20 January 2012 (UTC)Reply
