Talk:Rodríguez (surname)

Latest comment: 4 years ago by Mobi83 in topic Etymology


People named Rodríguez edit

Please, kind wikipedian, add names of people called Rodríguez. The Ogre 01:06, 4 December 2005 (UTC)Reply

What about Jose Rodriguez, US folk singer?

Etymology edit

As for the origin of the name the Old Norse Hróðgeirr, meaning proud spear or something to that effect springs to mind. Please correct me if I'm wrong. This is just a hunch. Cheerio Io 19:14, 12 December 2005 (UTC)Reply

I don't think so. As stated in the article, Rodríguez (Spanish) or Rodrigues (Portuguese) is a Patronymic, meaning Son of Rodrigo. Rodrigo comes from the Gothic Roderic (modern English Roderick), meaning Famous Ruler. In old Germanic languages it had forms such as Hrodric (Old High German) and Hroðricus (Old English). In Old Norse, Hrœrekr (Norway, Iceland) and Hrørīkr or Rørik (Denmark, Sweden), from which the Slavic Riurik is derived. The name also appears in Beowulf as Hrēðrīk[1]. The Ogre 01:40, 13 December 2005 (UTC)Reply
Well, I got the hróð-part right. :) (And you're right, hróðr means fame not pride, a slight slip on my part - I must have been distracted.) Cheerio Io 11:09, 13 December 2005 (UTC)Reply
Doesn't "ric" mean "rich"? I think the second part of the etymological translation is wrong. Then the name would mean "glorious", lit. famous-rich. Mobi83 (talk) 11:38, 8 May 2019 (UTC)Reply


vandalism edit

the sentence about the last Visigothic king "its before the abd Muslim conquest ob" or something like that has been vandalized -- believe it should say he was the last Visigothic king before the Muslim conquest and is the subject of many legends, but someone else will have to correct this.

Journey from Start to B-Class edit

Transcluded below are the current B-Class criteria. This section is for discussion of steps to move from Start to B-Class and checklisting of progress. This does not take into account the recent introduction of C-Class as a comparable criteria list has not been created for that new class yet. --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 14:19, 8 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

B
  1. The article is suitably referenced, with inline citations. It has reliable sources, and any important or controversial material which is likely to be challenged is cited. Any format of inline citation is acceptable: the use of <ref> tags and citation templates such as {{cite web}} is optional.
  2. The article reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain obvious omissions or inaccuracies. It contains a large proportion of the material necessary for an A-Class article, although some sections may need expansion, and some less important topics may be missing.
  3. The article has a defined structure. Content should be organized into groups of related material, including a lead section and all the sections that can reasonably be included in an article of its kind.
  4. The article is reasonably well-written. The prose contains no major grammatical errors and flows sensibly, but does not need to be of the standard of featured articles. The Manual of Style does not need to be followed rigorously.
  5. The article contains supporting materials where appropriate. Illustrations are encouraged, though not required. Diagrams, an infobox etc. should be included where they are relevant and useful to the content.
  6. The article presents its content in an appropriately understandable way. It is written with as broad an audience in mind as possible. The article should not assume unnecessary technical background and technical terms should be explained or avoided where possible.