Talk:Rodarte

Paring Down celebrity list

I was thinking that there's probably no need to list every celebrity who's worn the label, although that's more of a personal preference (at least I think it it, I haven't gone through the manual of style to see if there's a guideline somewhere). thoughts? --Bfigura ^(talk) 05:47, 24 November 2007 (UTC)

Black Swan Controversy Removed

Wikipedia:Verifiability

"Never use self-published sources as third-party sources about living people, even if the author is an expert, well-known professional researcher, or writer."

Self-published or questionable sources as sources on themselves Policy shortcuts: WP:ABOUTSELF WP:SELFPUB

Self-published and questionable sources may be used as sources of information about themselves, usually in articles about themselves or their activities, without the requirement in the case of self-published sources that they be published experts in the field, so long as:

  1. the material is not unduly self-serving;
  2. it does not involve claims about third parties;
  3. it does not involve claims about events not directly related to the source;
  4. there is no reasonable doubt as to its authenticity;
  5. the article is not based primarily on such sources.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Camaroman (talk • contribs) 18:33, 10 April 2011 (UTC) 

Reinserted, according to our guidelines the material is OK, no self-published sources. --Catgut (talk) 13:43, 22 June 2012 (UTC)

Bred, REALLY?

I assume it's meant as a joke... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.127.3.249 (talk) 02:22, 12 November 2013 (UTC)

See also

I added Dice Kayek, similar fashion enterprise run by another couple of sisters. It is a good "see also" example. --Why should I have a User Name? (talk) 22:43, 21 May 2014 (UTC)

I believe the fact that they are both fashion companies run by sisters is too tenuous to merit a see also link. Any third opinions? Calliopejen1 (talk) 22:44, 21 May 2014 (UTC)

Proposed merge with Kate and Laura Mulleavy

There doesn't appear to be enough reliable secondary sources for the sisters to have a stand alone article, as the majority of the coverage about them is about Rodarte - I think it's best if we just merge the sisters into this article in a specific section. Thoughts? Missvain (talk) 17:21, 9 October 2015 (UTC)

• Support (I know I'm late to this discussion!) per Missvain above - it seems a reasonable merge to me. Mabalu (talk) 14:42, 6 February 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 3 external links on Rodarte. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20110501040705/http://www.metmuseum.org/press_room/full_release.asp?prid={9BDA9A52-D512-43E8-A216-AC7655B06ABF} to http://www.metmuseum.org/press_room/full_release.asp?prid={9BDA9A52-D512-43E8-A216-AC7655B06ABF}
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20110929145604/http://www.artsusa.org/events/2010/naa/001.asp to http://www.artsusa.org/events/2010/naa/001.asp
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20100619231833/http://www.swisstextiles.ch:80/en/veranstaltungen/swiss_textiles_award/stella_fashion_night_2008/ to http://www.swisstextiles.ch/en/veranstaltungen/swiss_textiles_award/stella_fashion_night_2008/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 10:03, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

Contested edit

To my opinion, this edit is irrelevant and spam(my). According to the adding editor, it is a significant moment.

Please, can I hear your opinion? The Banner talk 16:12, 16 July 2019 (UTC)