This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles
This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles
Latest comment: 12 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion
Leave this site up! I just saw it created and gone? I have waited to read more about these guys. Leave it up and protect it!
:Absolutely not. The company comes nowhere near meeting Wikipedia criteria for notability of companies. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 16:56, 18 June 2011 (UTC)
Reply
OK, an article about a company in the New York Times is enough to at least pass minimum notability requirements. It'll stay, at least for now and probably for good. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 17:19, 18 June 2011 (UTC)Reply
