| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Robin Vos article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This page is about an active politician who is running for office or has recently run for office, is in office and campaigning for re-election, or is involved in some current political conflict or controversy. Because of this, this article is at increased risk of biased editing, talk-page trolling, and simple vandalism. |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Affair edit
An editor keeps removing content about Vos's affair. Would the editor mind explaining why? Snooganssnoogans (talk) 03:50, 14 May 2019 (UTC)
SPA account edits edit
A single-purpose account keeps adding WP:SYNTH content about Vos and COVID-19. It should be removed ASAP. Snooganssnoogans (talk) 14:46, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
- I agree that much of this is WP:SYNTH and have removed it. Neutralitytalk 22:25, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Recall edit
@Asdasdasdff I am unsure about if the wording on saying the recall "failed" is entirely correct, especially since there's still a lot of questions surrounding the recall, and "the Elections Commission staff plan to conduct a second review of signatures and will determine how many valid signatures are present under the old and new electoral maps." (per Milwaukee Journal Sentinel) so the initial claim could be proven wrong later, I guess. I mostly want to be sure saying the effort failed isn't jumping the gun, especially with a lot of open ended questions and uncertainty at the moment. Talthiel (talk) 19:01, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
- Yeah.. I'll add a modifier, but I really suspect the old 63rd district boundaries (used in the initial analysis) will be the boundaries utilized for the validation of the recall petition. -- Asdasdasdff (talk) 19:19, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
- Yeah, plus, I might be overestimating a bit but the intial signature totals aren't final, and the total for Vos' old district is still close enough that theoretically a more close counting/examination could turn that number into the required totals, even if that is turning out to be unlikely. Talthiel (talk) 19:30, 12 March 2024 (UTC)