Talk:Robert de Ferrers, 6th Earl of Derby

Derbyshire Low‑importance

	Derbyshire portal The article on Robert de Ferrers, 6th Earl of Derby is supported by the Derbyshire WikiProject, which is a collaborative effort to improve the quality and coverage of Derbyshire-related articles on Wikipedia.DerbyshireWikipedia:WikiProject DerbyshireTemplate:WikiProject DerbyshireDerbyshire articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Biography: Peerage and Baronetage

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Peerage and Baronetage.

Middle Ages Low‑importance

	Middle Ages portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

A fact from Robert de Ferrers, 6th Earl of Derby appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 12 November 2007. The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that after Robert de Ferrers, the 6th Earl of Derby was pardoned for his part in a civil war against King Edward I, he rebelled again?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2007/November.

Wikipedia

Untitled edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Given that the de Ferrers owned most of Derbyshire for around 200 years "low importance" seems a little harsh. Chevin (talk) 13:27, 30 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Add topic