This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Oklahoma, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Oklahoma on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OklahomaWikipedia:WikiProject OklahomaTemplate:WikiProject OklahomaOklahoma articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North America, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Native Americans, Indigenous peoples in Canada, and related indigenous peoples of North America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Indigenous peoples of North AmericaWikipedia:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaTemplate:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaIndigenous peoples of North America articles
Latest comment: 13 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion
Is this some US legal distinction? Enrolled as opposed to what?
Why can't he just be called a member? Period. No qualifying adjective.
Varlaam (talk) 23:22, 21 July 2010 (UTC)Reply
"Enrolled" is the most commonly used term for actually being a legal member of the tribe, in this case, the United Keetoowah Band of Cherokees Indians, a federally recognized Indian tribe, and thus, yes, Robert J. Conley is Native American and legally recognized as such by the US and by Cherokee tribes. As the cited reference states. "Enrolled" is the appropriate term, as opposed to being an "associate member" which does not mean a person is Native by blood or have legal status as an Indian. The $10 comment was unbelievably insulting and uncalled for. -Uyvsdi (talk) 02:45, 22 July 2010 (UTC)UyvsdiReply
I (who have no connection with Varlaam) see no insult, nor, indeed, any comment at all. There are three questions, asking (very reasonably) why the world "enrolled" is used in this context. Thanks to Uyvsdi for the interesting and informative reply. Paulannis (talk) 15:30, 14 September 2010 (UTC)Reply
