Talk:Robert F. Kennedy 1968 presidential campaign

Latest comment: 4 years ago by JustinTime55 in topic Positions section

Picture edit

The current picture is from 1963, but the article is specifically about 1968. Are there any public domain pictures of RFK from 1968? Nightkey (talk) 23:50, 3 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

Positions section edit

The content here really needs to include positions that relate to RFK's 1968 campaign platform. It appears that the content on Civil Rights and Cuba in particular have been cut/pasted from other related RFK Wikipedia pages that cover time period before 1968. It isn't clear why they're included here. Could someone try to improve content for this section? Rosalina523 (talk) 18:20, 31 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

Agreed. After seven years, I've taken care of removing these two irrelevant subsections. Cuba and the missile crisis were moot in 1968. A better civil rights section maybe could be written, but this would be tricky; we're flirting with original research here. RFK could boast of being the author of his brother's civil rights bill, but since JFK couldn't get it past the southern Democrats and LBJ did, he would in essence be "running against himself". Though it's a terrible thing to say, the timing of Martin Luther King's assassination was fortunate for RFK in that he could appeal to King's martyrdom. We need to go back to the historical literature to see how RFK actually campaigned on civil rights. JustinTime55 (talk) 15:05, 11 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Robert F. Kennedy presidential campaign, 1968. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:59, 25 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

Copyedit edit

I've copyedited what I can per a Kierzek's GOCE request, but it needs work beyond what I can do in a copy edit. The last thing I am going to do is remove the who tags I added and add the full names for the scholars the first time they are used. I've removed some content that came too close to speculating about the causes of RFK's assassination, specifically that Nixon ended up running against Humphrey and winning because this has nothing to do with RFK's campaign. I think going back to the sources and fleshing out the narrative further would be a good idea. In my estimation, I would say this is still C-class. Seraphim System (talk) 23:18, 21 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for your time and copy edit work. Kierzek (talk) 13:35, 22 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

"After the California primary, McCarthy advisors joined the Kennedy campaign with plans for supporting it toward gaining the nomination.[124]"? edit

Uh...after the California primary, Bobby was immediately shot and his campaign ended. There was no Kennedy campaign for McCarthy advisors to join. Was that meant to read "After the California primary, Kennedy advisors joined the McCarthy campaign with plans for supporting it towards getting the nomination"? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:603:4E00:7876:2804:933B:E220:BF86 (talk) 02:20, 29 May 2019 (UTC)Reply