Talk:Robert Eisler

Untitled

The Gerschom Scholem quote in this article is quite dsihonest. Consider later down the same page in the same edition cited, "I often reported to [Benjamin] on Eisler's quotation laden leaps into scholarly adventurism, with enterprises that at various times were as sensational as they were unsuccessful." I have updated it with the word "mockingly" so that it maintains Scholem's intended meaning.

Slavonic

"Slavonic manuscripts (the authenticity of which has been questioned).[7]" The footnote has nothing to do with the authenticity of the Slavonic copies. The Slavonic versions contain info missing from the Greek and Latin versions which if valid helps confirm Eisler's theory so this point is critical.Nitpyck (talk) 14:22, 7 November 2011 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Robert Eisler. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20061107095825/http://members.aol.com:80/FLJOSEPHUS/eisler.htm to http://members.aol.com/fljosephus/eisler.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 08:03, 22 February 2016 (UTC)

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Robert Eisler/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

This article on Eisler is much more than dishonest. It gives the impression that Eisler was a scatterbrained, unable to manage biblical questions. Indeed, he was the first scholar who put all his efforts into the old russian version of Jewish War. Before his research on the slavonic version, scholars were not acquainted with the subject. This is a wretched and factious article, probably written by an apologist not acquainted with Eisler at all. For example, the author says that S. G. F. Brandon assumed that Jesus was a zealot, but the grim reality is that Brandon never spoke of Jesus in these terms. On the other hand, Brandon drew the figure of Jesus near the zealot party, but he never identified the Jesus's moviment with that of zealots. Regards.

Last edited at 11:57, 7 November 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 04:35, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Robert Eisler. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061215114015/http://members.optusnet.com.au/~gtosiris/page9i.html to http://members.optusnet.com.au/~gtosiris/page9i.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:44, 9 January 2018 (UTC)