Talk:Robert Eggplant
Latest comment: 13 years ago by 98.234.95.213 in topic Name origin
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 11 November 2020. The result of the discussion was keep. |
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Name origin edit
If this story isn't referenced soon, I'll remove it. I expect there's a decent reference out there somewhere for the origin of his name.98.234.95.213 (talk) 08:46, 7 August 2010 (UTC)
Controversy edit
Uhm is there any citation for the entire controversy section? WTF. 209.237.13.90 23:37, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
- No there isn't i am deleting it. I would like to propose this article for deletion. (Warhols ghost 05:37, 10 May 2007 (UTC))
- It doesn't need to be deleted, as I think Robert Eggplant has done a lot of good for the East Bay punk scene as well as other places; it just seemed like that one section was written by someone out to slander his name, which happens a lot with crazy wingnuts in Berkeley and elsewhere. 69.228.196.219 16:42, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
who was the original author of the controversy section?