Talk:Robert Bacher/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Gilderien (talk · contribs) 14:52, 21 April 2013 (UTC)

First look - well written, couple of minor concerns;

• Please DAB Luis Alvarez, and James Conant.
  • Done. Hawkeye7 (talk) 20:10, 21 April 2013 (UTC)
• Could you confirm that in your writing style the citations at the end of a paragraph will cover all of the material therein?
  • Yes. Each footnote covers the text back to the previous footnote, or the start of the paragraph, whichever comes first.
• "As luck would have it" - tone seems slightly too informal for an encyclopædia, could you re-word it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gilderien (talk • contribs) 20:21, 21 April 2013 (UTC)
  • Done. Hawkeye7 (talk) 20:40, 21 April 2013 (UTC)

--Gilderien Chat|List of good deeds 15:01, 21 April 2013 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality: Yes, very -

   B. MoS compliance:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources: Well, (almost) all offline but seems reliable -

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales: All images appear to be in the public domain -

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

7. Overall:

1. Pass or Fail:

A very good article, and easily the fastest I have passed a GA.--Gilderien Chat|List of good deeds 20:43, 21 April 2013 (UTC)