Talk:River Line SSSI
Latest comment: 13 years ago by Geopersona in topic Suggest renaming the article
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
 | It is requested that an image or photograph be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
Suggest renaming the article edit
My personal opinion is that this article should be renamed River Line (SSSI), unless there is a precedent for disambiguating these articles with (site)? ++ MortimerCat (talk) 07:42, 28 September 2008 (UTC
- Decided to go with River Line (East Sussex) as the other River Lines follow this format. ++ MortimerCat (talk) 22:32, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
- I strongly suggest that the name does need to be changed; at present the title is quite misleading. I clicked on the link expecting to find an article about the river and was offered an article about a geological SSSI. It is interesting in itself and a worthy article but it is not at all what its title suggests. I suggest a new name of River Line SSSI (East Sussex) for this article. Awkwardly, lots of other pages point this way at present so I suggest that the river as a whole be lumped in with the rivers Brede, Tillingham and Rother to which it is tributary. cheers Geopersona (talk) 05:59, 8 December 2010 (UTC)