Talk:Rio Puerco (Rio Grande tributary)

Latest comment: 7 years ago by Andrewa in topic Requested move 5 April 2017

Requested move 5 April 2017 edit

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: pages moved. Andrewa (talk) 05:27, 12 April 2017 (UTC)Reply


– The draft convention for river/tributary disambiguation is inconsistent with normal disambiguators. See preliminary discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Rivers#Tributary naming convention. Parenthetical identifiers should say what kind of thing the topic is (the generic class, subject, or context per WP:NCDAB). If we agree on these, we can re-draft the convention and work on others. Dicklyon (talk) 04:38, 5 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

    • Support both moves, and I'll support moves for similarly constructed article names. The meaning of the "River name (River name)" construction is not immediately clear, and adding "tributary" will help. --TimK MSI (talk) 10:35, 6 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.