This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
Latest comment: 3 years ago5 comments5 people in discussion
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: not moved. -- JHunterJ (talk) 11:52, 14 September 2020 (UTC)Reply
– No indication that the 500-year-old activities of the diplomat hold sufficient historical import for primary status. — Roman Spinner(talk • contribs) 07:24, 7 September 2020 (UTC)Reply
Oppose. Although the settler's article is longer, the diplomat does appear to have the most historical significance by quite a long way. The only other two real people with articles were really notable to their local area only, whereas the diplomat was a figure of national and international importance. -- Necrothesp (talk) 11:13, 8 September 2020 (UTC)Reply
Support per nom.--Ortizesp (talk) 15:51, 8 September 2020 (UTC)Reply
Oppose Due to lack of a rationale provided in the nomination. There is no such thing as "sufficient historical import for primary status," as primary topics are determined relative to other subjects of the same name and not some arbitrary bar of historical importance.--Yaksar(let's chat) 19:05, 10 September 2020 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
