Fair use rationale for Image:DBCooper article.jpg edit

 

Image:DBCooper article.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 06:56, 1 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

  Resolved

--TJRC (talk) 21:19, 1 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Citation Needed for Hitch-Hiking Claim edit

I have researched this subject in conjunction with my involvement with a federal agency, and all information I have found and am familiar with states that McCoy became a suspect as a result of his claims that such a hijack could be easily accomplished. I have seen no evidence of a hitch-hiking claim prior to McCoy already having been considered a suspect. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.82.11.15 (talk) 11:26, 2 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

I agree. The paragraph in question is misleading in saying "McCoy also had described to a number of people how easy..." the FBI reference cited said he mentioned to an acquaintance a "fullproof plan" for an airplane hijacking. Said acquaintance approached the FBI...that is how McCoy became a suspect. According to the FBI page on McCoy (ref #3 on the current edit), after the acquaintance came forward, more leads developed connecting McCoy: "When shown McCoy's photograph an employee at a roadside hamburger stand said she had sold him a milkshake at about 11:30 on the night of the crime. In addition, a teenager stated that a man fitting McCoy's description paid him five dollars for a ride from the stand to a nearby town." —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.196.151.13 (talk) 15:33, 22 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Did he jump? edit

It is not clear in the article. It just states he asked for the parachutes and had the plane. Did he actually jump and survive? If so, any description from witnesses? If not, what was the method he got away?--MartinezMD (talk) 03:15, 2 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

It just states he made his escape. I would say you need to have read the DB Cooper article to understand, so yes, it's not clear. The escape method should be described/duplicated here too. CapnZapp (talk) 09:33, 30 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

McCoy did jump, survive and escape with his ransom money just as D.B. is presumed to have done. McCoy flew a helicopter that was searching for the hijacker right after committing the the hijacking himself. He was turned in by his friends or family. Read the questions Steven Rinehart proposed to Judge Winder cited in the footnotes. Very interesting. Agent Carr with the FBI in Seattle he does not think McCoy was Cooper, but said Rinehart was the best source for info on McCoy. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.169.155.73 (talk) 07:56, 30 July 2008 (UTC) UPDATE: Judge Winder retired from the federal bench with alzheimer's a year ago. I'm told he may have done an interview with Rinehart about the case that's not to be aired until he dies. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.169.155.73 (talk) 08:01, 30 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Death edit

Please either move the paragraph detailing his shooting to the "Death and afterwards" section, or rename the section into "After Death" (or "Legacy" etc).CapnZapp (talk) 09:31, 30 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Moved from article edit

The following text was added to the article by Vonmazur: "Incorrect!!, he served as a Green Beret in Nam in 1964, and then was at Ft Wolters TX and Ft Rucker AL WORWAC Class 66-23, he graduated on 14 Feb 1967 and went back to Nam as a Warrant Officer and Aviator....All of this chronology is not right. I was a class mate of his...". Graham87 15:42, 3 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Richard McCoy, Jr.. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 11:33, 20 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

BYU medallion a hoax? Should be removed from the article ASAP? edit

Under “Lawsuits over Cooper Allegations,” the article states:

“They cited similar methods of hijacking, and a tie and Brigham Young University medallion [citation needed] with McCoy's initials on the back left on the plane by Cooper.”

This video about the D.B. Cooper case states that the BYU medallion claim seems to have no substance in fact and then goes on to state (including a most disparaging reference to Wiki) that the entire story of this alleged piece of evidence stems from a Wikipedia article (I assume they mean this one as it is not mentioned within the D. B. Cooper article) which others picked up upon and used in various internet venues (listen at 9:28 into the video for a short spell):

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oHSehKtDyoI

Since the article itself states: “citation needed,” it seems as if this should be eliminated unless someone can come up with some valid documentation regarding the alleged medallion's existence. Otherwise, it appears as if Wikipedia is disseminating misinformation.HistoryBuff14 (talk) 15:37, 22 August 2017 (UTC)Reply