Talk:Ribblehead Viaduct
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Ribblehead Viaduct article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
The route diagram template for this article can be found in Template:Settle-Carlisle Line. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Scheduled monument edit
The NHLE listings for the viaduct and the camp didn't match so I checked with English Heritage and they have confirmed, and updated the entry, that the viaduct itself is not a scheduled monument but the land around the pier foundations is. Nthep (talk) 20:22, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
Assessment comment edit
The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Ribblehead Viaduct/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.
.
Keith D 17:29, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
|
Last edited at 06:56, 25 August 2013 (UTC). Substituted at 04:16, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
14 May 2020 edit edit
2A00:23C5:FC94:C400:C8C8:1241:9455:9E3A Regarding this edit; The Daily Mail is an unreliable source and the formatting was somewhat awry too. If you can find a reliable source, then please re-insert. Thanks. The joy of all things (talk) 15:34, 14 May 2020 (UTC)