Talk:Rhodococcus equi

Microbiology Start‑class Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Microbiology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Microbiology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MicrobiologyWikipedia:WikiProject MicrobiologyTemplate:WikiProject MicrobiologyMicrobiology articles
Start	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Medicine Low‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Veterinary medicine Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Veterinary medicine, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Veterinary medicine on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Veterinary medicineWikipedia:WikiProject Veterinary medicineTemplate:WikiProject Veterinary medicineVeterinary medicine articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

New generic name edit

Latest comment: 2 years ago4 comments4 people in discussion

Rhodococcus equi has been given its own new genus: Prescottia from Jones, Sutcliffe and Goodfellow (2013) Prescottia equi gen. nov., comb. nov.: a new home for an old pathogen, Antonie van Leeuwenhoek, 103 (3), pp. 655-671, doi:10.1007/s10482-012-9850-8 Elspooky (talk) 23:18, 14 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

I'm not sure what to do with this. I don't want to create this big move off of one source, but I do want to accurately reflect the literature. I think I'm going to leave it be for now: see a name correction paper, I want to see some citations first. Icebob99 (talk) 19:03, 16 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

I added a section about the debate over the name. The debate has been going on for over 30 years, and doesn't look like it will be finalized soon. DferDaisy (talk) 02:58, 23 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

Just noticed this morning that the V10 Bruker MALDI-TOF database calls it Rhodococcus hoagii. NCBI taxonomy browser is (as of 22 June 2021) calling it Rhodococcus hoagii with equi being a homotypic synonym. The reason for the change is that, as a species name, hoagii predates equi by a decade (Morse 1912 for hoagii, Magnusson 1923 for equi). Serrin (talk) 23:12, 21 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

Add topic