Talk:rg chromaticity

Latest comment: 3 months ago by MasterLee in topic Rg chromacity of black.


Question edit

Who knows the questions?

Why usually to use the rg chromaticity,why not to use rb or gb chromaticity.

Thanks! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Jackie5168 (talkcontribs) .

Rg chromacity of black. edit

When R+G+B is 0, should (r,g) be (0,0) or (1,1)? --24.131.215.166 (talk) 03:26, 13 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Undefined, obviously, since the divisor is zero. Black does not have a chromaticity, in general (undefined x,y,z coordinates). Dicklyon (talk) 03:29, 13 October 2008 (UTC)Reply
(1,1) would not be ok because r+g+b=1 and thus would give b=-1. (0,0) on the other hand would give b=1 which would correspond to blue. But incorporating that black should not have a chromaticity which is given by r=g=b another solution would be (1/3,1/3) MasterLee (talk) 15:44, 29 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Linearity and Gamma edit

The article should mention whether the sum R + G + B is done with linear or nonlinear RGB values. The article mentions 8-bit RGB values (0 .. 255), which traditionally have a gamma value implied; in the case of gamma 2.2 an RGB value of 128 would indicate a 22% light intensity (one half to the power of 2.2). On the other hand, normalized RGB values are usually taken to be linear, so a value of 0.5 indicates 50% light intensity. The article should be clear about which is which. See the article about standard RGB for details. 80.171.110.26 (talk) 05:35, 13 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Given how much of an ad hoc hack this is, I'd say it's done on sRGB. Or whatever non-linear RGB you happen to have. It's computer vision, not quite an exact science -- they sometimes use HSL (also defined over "whatever RGB available") and say it works well too. --Artoria2e5 🌉 18:48, 8 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Conversion to RGB edit

If G = 0, the conversions back to R and B won't work.

Slapdash5 (talk) 04:42, 8 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

True, if you mean from r,g,G space, then G=0 leaves the conversion completely ambiguous. That's not a fault of the equations. Dicklyon (talk) 05:47, 8 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

Confusion with CIE edit

The entire section with the RGB color-matching functions confuses the computer "RGB" with the CIE 1931 RGB. These two systems have nothing to do with each other; in particular, you are never going to build a light with negative energy emission at a certain wavelength. I propose removing this part completely -- in fact, I will remove it if I check back a month later and see no objection. --Artoria2e5 🌉 18:51, 8 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Njm7203, I am extremely sorry for being harsh AF, but... I am planning to revert your work and I think you should be notified. --Artoria2e5 🌉 18:56, 8 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Do you plan on following this up? Curran919 (talk) 20:26, 10 November 2022 (UTC)Reply