Talk:Reverse leakage current

Untitled

I believe the reverse leakage current (in BJT's) or reverse-bias saturation current (in diodes) is independent of the voltage across the device (although there are two names, they are caused by the same phenomenon) and is not present in other transistor types (such as the MOSFET). It is caused by minority carriers (positive charge in the N-type region, negative charge in the P-type region) that are able to drift across the P-N junction. The magnitude of the current is dependent on two of the device's physical properties: (1) doping concentration; (2) area of the P-N junction. It is a non-ideal effect.

Recall the equation for the current in a diode is something of the order: I_D = I_S(e^blah - 1)
Where I_D is the resulting current in the diode, and I_S is the reverse-bias saturation current.

The reverse leakage current is very small (in the range of ferroamps, give or take), but is always subtracted from the forward current (because of the -1 term in parenthesis). When the diode is forward biased at a large enough voltage, the exponential term dominates the equation (sorry, I left the details out of this term, but the voltage across the diode is in the 'blah' term, increasing the voltage makes the exp. term larger) and the forward current is much larger than the leakage current.

For example, at a sufficient forward bias, the forward current may be in the range of mA and the reverse current in the range of fA. The reverse current is so small in comparison, that for practical purposes, it can be ignored. But it is always there!

For those who want to lurk further into the theory behind this, there are two types of current; the forward diode current is called a 'diffusion' current, the reverse leakage current is called a 'drift' current.

I hope this helped more than it hurt... peace.

-Ryan

It is not independent of the voltage across it. This would not make sense, although it certainly couldn't be modeled as simply as it is in diodes. Just like diodes and BJTs, MOSFETs do also have a reverse leakage, (body-drain junction) also voltage dependent. It is correct the current is affected by the characteristics of the junction you mentioned though. The current is rarely as small as you mentioned (femtoamps) under normal conditions although still usually negligible. THORNFIELD HALL ^(Talk)

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Reverse leakage current/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Thanks man..this helped some

Last edited at 08:21, 9 July 2008 (UTC). Substituted at 04:14, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

Merge with Reverse saturation current?

Is "Reverse saturation current" identical to "Reverse leakage current" ?
Should these pages be merged? (I'm not authoritatively knowledgeable in electronics to know, myself)
(I think the other page has more connectivity in Wikipedia than this one does, but one should check the 'what links here' tool prior to merging just to be sure)
--RProgrammer (talk) 21:41, 25 January 2017 (UTC)

I know you probably won't see this, so this is for everybody else's edification, especially as many texts don't make the distinction: Reverse saturation current is the current as modeled solely by the Shockley diode equation, and reverse leakage current includes that current and the remainder. Reverse saturation is more temperature dependent than the other. — THORNFIELD HALL ^(Talk) 05:53, 29 January 2024 (UTC)