This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Latest comment: 2 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion
I can't speak for the rest of the article, but this particular section (1.6.3 "Tacitus") has some problematic lines that go against WP:NPOV.
I refer namely to the lines, "The least that can be said is that the two quotes above (like so many passages in Tacitus' writings) are a translator's minefield", and "Nonetheless it can only be admired in Tacitus how, with some judicially chosen words, he most poignantly and to the point describes the transition". Mister Omega 212 (talk) 16:15, 20 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
