Talk:Reichsrat (Germany)

Germany Mid‑importance

	Germany portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

European history

	Europe portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject European history, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the history of Europe on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.European historyWikipedia:WikiProject European historyTemplate:WikiProject European historyEuropean history articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Reichstag v. Reichsrat

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

♠The third paragraph states:

So in effect, bills vetoed by the Reichstag very frequently died.

But isn't the point that the Reichsrat had the power to veto the legislation of the Reichstag? Thus in the sentence from the article that is quoted above, it seems like Reichstag is a mistake and it should instead read Reichsrat, i.e. if the Reichsrat vetoed a bill it was difficult to get the supermajority needed in the Reichstag to override that veto.♠ SixBlueFish (talk) 20:33, 11 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

This article seems totally wrong

Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

This article is in total conflict with the main article on the German Empire (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/German_Empire) and the article on the North German Confederation. They both state that the upper house was the Reichsrat, NOT the Bundesrat as stated here. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.169.162.100 (talk) 10:40, 29 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

I agree. It seems contradictory, and is at best, very confusing. (I, too, came here via a link from the North German Confederation. A possible explanation is that two Reichsrats existed, one during the former government and another during the Weimar era. Someone with knowledge of the subject needs to clarify this (and the phrase mentioned in the preceding section, though since corrected, remains cumbersome and a little confusing, even if it's technically accurate).

I think someone should put a template message that's more general than just the mention of lacking citations – the whole article needs attention.

— Autocorrelation (talk) 12:03, 2 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Translation of German-language article 6 Nov 2022

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I kept none of the English-language article because it had no significant material that isn't in the German version, and there were places where I think it was a bit off-base, such as comparing the Reichsrat to the English House of Lords. I added a number of new references to the German article, including all of the direct references to article numbers in the Weimar constitution.

Feedback welcomed here or on my talk page. GHStPaulMN (talk) 23:13, 6 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Add topic