| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Reflexology article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 365 days  |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
Recent changes edit
Theartofhealing This is the article's talk page. Your changes have been disputed, you need to propose them below and get consensus before trying to reinstate them. Thanks Girth Summit (blether) 05:40, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
Unhelpful article edit
This article is not about reflexology. It is about why the author thinks reflexology is quackery. Honestly, this article should be renamed to “reflexology is quackery”. That way an actual reflexologist could write a helpful article called “Reflexology”.
I would like to see Wikipedia or the author retitle this article. 98.31.6.130 (talk) 01:32, 29 August 2022 (UTC)
- Since reflexologists are quacks, it would be a bad idea to have them write articles here. It would go against Wikipedia's goal of summarizing reliable sources.
- You can get what you want in other places, so your wish to get it here too is pointless. --Hob Gadling (talk) 06:44, 29 August 2022 (UTC)