Talk:Red Riding Hood (2006 film)
Latest comment: 4 years ago by Rockphed in topic Formerly removed "external links"
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Formerly removed "external links" edit
Looking at old versions of this article, it seems to have started with about a dozen links of varying quality. If this film is notable, it would be so for its possibly innovative techniques. The old versions of this article did not have very good tone, but maybe we can pull some salient information out. Alternatively, if we can find multiple national level reviews of this film (in whatever nation), then it probably is notable. One of the old, probably now dead, links was to a review. Perhaps there are more. Rockphed (talk) 14:30, 5 July 2019 (UTC)
- On further digging, the best source for relevant information about this film's technical achievements might be the April 2006 issue of American Cinematographer. The internet archive has a teaser about it here, but that is rather thin evidence to evidence notability. Without the article, I don't think we can even show that it is independent. I suspect that most of the other pieces linked to in the early articles are either unreliable (e.g. ad work made by a supplier to the film) or are not independent of the film (e.g. press releases by the art director about how the film was made). Rockphed (talk) 14:53, 5 July 2019 (UTC)