Talk:Recognition Professionals International

Untitled

Further additions might include publications, conferences, and history. --Email4jonathan (talk) 18:57, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

The article also needs verifiable references to show notability per WP:N and WP:Notability (organizations and companies) otherwise it is likely to be speedily deleted. --ukexpat (talk) 19:53, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the heads-up. I've found several third-party information about RPI that I will incorporate into the article. Hopefully I can get feedback on these additions so that the article can stay. I know RPI is new (and I'm not even a member of it), but I've worked with them and know the organization represents some very big companies. But if after I make some additions, if it still isn't up to par, then lets re-evaluate whether or not it should be in Wikipedia. Thanks. --Email4jonathan (talk) 20:59, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

Okay, I've added a bit more information with third-party sources. I feel that the RPI is noteworthy because of its amazing growth history, its unique goals (focusing only on recognition), and its high integration with big companies in such a short amount of time. Article could still use info about its publications and conferences. --Email4jonathan (talk) 21:47, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

"Decline speedy, current included refs seem to assert notability (and more could be added - 95 Google News hits for the old name)" by User:Pegasus. Thank you! --Email4jonathan (talk) 03:16, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 7 external links on Recognition Professionals International. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111227033538/http://www.recognition.org/displaycommon.cfm?an=1&subarticlenbr=8 to http://www.recognition.org/displaycommon.cfm?an=1&subarticlenbr=8
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060901165359/http://www.hr.arizona.edu/05_prf/recog/sites.php to http://www.hr.arizona.edu/05_prf/recog/sites.php
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080424041040/http://www.recognition.org/displaycommon.cfm?an=1&subarticlenbr=31 to http://www.recognition.org/displaycommon.cfm?an=1&subarticlenbr=31
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080415084732/http://www.prnewsnow.com/Public_Release/Finance/147623.html to http://www.prnewsnow.com/Public_Release/Finance/147623.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071213040351/http://www.hrmreport.com/pastissue/article.asp?art=271043&issue=216 to http://www.hrmreport.com/pastissue/article.asp?art=271043&issue=216
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080421070437/http://www.recognition.org/displaycommon.cfm?an=1&subarticlenbr=13 to http://recognition.org/displaycommon.cfm?an=1&subarticlenbr=13
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080303045629/http://www.med.umich.edu/umhshr/recognition/resources/index.htm to http://www.med.umich.edu/umhshr/recognition/resources/index.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:51, 24 June 2017 (UTC)