Talk:Receptaculites

Algae Low‑importance

	This article is part of WikiProject Algae, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the photosynthetic organisms commonly called algae and related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AlgaeWikipedia:WikiProject AlgaeTemplate:WikiProject AlgaeAlgae articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Palaeontology Low‑importance

	Paleontology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

"Receptaculites fossels are found in only two strata of rock layers and are found only in rock country in northern Illinois" Fossils is the correct spelling, also there are Receptaculites fossils in Australian Limestone. In the Taemus Peninsula there is a massive limestone bed called the Receptaculites due to the 1m layer of Receptaculites. I was lucky enough to have found a specimen amongst the float. So I think that statement is wrong and needs to be changed...

Removing text edit

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

That chunk of text which gives a few localities for receptaculitid fossils is essentially meaningless. Receptaculitids are found all over the world in a large number of rock units. We need more general statements and information for a professional article like this.Wilson44691 (talk) 02:58, 20 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Add topic