Talk:Rebutia minuscula
Latest comment: 12 years ago by Peter coxhead in topic Image labelled Rebutia kariusiana
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
 | This article is written in British English with Oxford spelling (colour, realize, organization, analyse; note that -ize is used instead of -ise) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
Image labelled Rebutia kariusiana edit
Sources such as Anderson (2001) are clear that in the wild the species generally has red flowers, although a subspecies violaciflora is mentioned. Pilbeam (1987) mentions R. minuscula subsp. violaciflora forma kariusiana with pale pink flowers, which may be what is shown in this image, which was added to the taxobox. However, The Plant List entry says that R. kariusiana is "unresolved". So I don't think that we should use this image without more evidence/support from reliable sources. Plants in cultivation are often under the wrong names. Peter coxhead (talk) 23:13, 22 April 2012 (UTC)
