This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anarchism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of anarchism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AnarchismWikipedia:WikiProject AnarchismTemplate:WikiProject Anarchismanarchism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
Because it is not a review of this book This book may, indeed, be mentioned in this review, but, if so, it ought to be an in-line source.E.M.Gregory (talk) 20:18, 29 December 2016 (UTC)Reply
??? Yes it is. See page 53. Please restore the ref. czar 06:42, 30 December 2016 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 7 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion
No claim to notability is made, and the reviews are mainly to anarchist publicaitons, which support w=notabiity weakly, at best.E.M.Gregory (talk) 20:18, 29 December 2016 (UTC)Reply
It was reviewed with depth in six sources and there is more than enough linked content with which to write an article. It would, without doubt, survive an AfD. czar 06:54, 30 December 2016 (UTC)Reply
I have added a prod template. A handful of reviews in specialist journals is not enough for notability. Xxanthippe (talk) 02:41, 31 December 2016 (UTC).Reply
