Talk:Reactions to the 2021–2022 Russo-Ukrainian crisis
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to Eastern Europe or the Balkans, which has been designated as a contentious topic. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. |
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org |
|
Suggestion to correct title edit
I would suggest changing the article name to "Reactions to the 2021-2022 Russo-Ukrainian crisis". It's grammatically correct - at least. No more elaborations are needed. PenangLion (talk) 11:18, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
Reaction of the People’s Republic of China edit
China says the US is the ‘main instigator’ of the war in Ukraine - https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2022/8/10/china-accuses-us-as-main-instigator-of-the-war-in-ukraine
China hammers home its message of US blame for Ukraine war to domestic audience - https://www.scmp.com/news/china/diplomacy/article/3172228/china-hammers-home-its-message-us-blame-ukraine-war-domestic (Chinese gov’t owned news agency admitting this) Solidarityandfreedom (talk) 00:41, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion edit
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 06:21, 4 December 2022 (UTC)
Name edit
@TankDude2000 I contest your move to "Reactions to the Prelude to the Russian invasion of Ukraine". The current title is better. It is non-idiomatic to say "reactions to the prelude (of something)", and mildly nonsensical. The reactions were to concrete, individual, events during this period, which was afterwards characterized as the prelude. The title is also miscapitalized (Prelude). —Alalch E. 09:52, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
- Then revert the other page as well! TankDude2000 (talk) 15:18, 18 April 2023 (UTC)