| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Raymond Franz article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| Archives: 1 |
 | The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information. |
 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Untitled edit
Seeing that wikipedia is a FREE - open source information center, I feel that it is inappropriate to quote a source unavailable to the lamen observer requiring special authority to access hidden information. i.e. http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,922767-1,00.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.58.27.171 (talk) 13:12, 13 July 2012 (UTC)
- While wikipedia is itself a free resource, that in no way implies its scope should be limited to resources that are also free, and maintaining a paid membership to Time magazine hardly qualifies as "special authority." Anyone can access it, they need only pay for a membership. It is frustrating though, when a cited source isn't available for free, or is for other reasons not easily available. However, that doesn't meant those sources shouldn't be used at all. If you want more information, you can check out WP:PAYWALL. Rytyho usa (talk) 11:24, 8 December 2012 (UTC)
LA Times article edit
While it may be true that "Franz stated the request for his resignation and his subsequent disfellowshipping resulted from allegations of apostasy", I don't believe the article cited supports this statement. In regards to his disfellowshipping, it has only this to say (last sentence): "Franz was disfellowshipped at the end of 1981 in a case involving his changed views of the organization's theology". The article doesn't indicate that Franz himself was stating anything, doesn't give a reason for his resignation, and doesn't use the term "apostasy". Jhowar59 (talk) 12:10, 12 March 2015 (UTC)