Talk:Rattlesnake Fire (2018)

Latest comment: 1 year ago by LunaEatsTuna in topic GA Review

Move discussion in progress edit

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Camp Fire (2018) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 08:21, 14 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

GA Review edit

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


This review is transcluded from Talk:Rattlesnake Fire (2018)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: LunaEatsTuna (talk · contribs) 02:04, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

  • That should be all; short but sweet! Please ping me once you have addressed my concerns so that I can know when to reevaluate. Thanks, 𓃦LunaEatsTuna (💬) 02:49, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply
  • Nice work! I am now happy to pass this article for GA status. Congrats! 𓃦LunaEatsTuna (💬) 05:49, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Copyvio check edit

Earwig says good to go.

Files edit

  • File:2018 04 13-18.24.10.381-CDT.jpg: relevant, high quality and copyright free—valid public domain rationale.

Prose edit

  • "Around 1:30 PM (Mountain Time)" – standard time or DST?
  • "The fire expanded onto the San Carlos Indian Reservation" – should it not be into?
  • Probably not, but I've made this changed for consistency. –♠Vamí_IV†♠ 04:49, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply
  • "progress on April 22 thanks to improved weather" – change to "progress on April 22 due to improved weather" or something similar.
  • "which grew over the next day to 21,513 acres (8,706 ha)." – recommend "which grew to over 21,513 acres (8,706 ha) the next day."
  • "No definite cause was determined, however." – recommend "However, no definite cause could be determined."

Refs edit

Passes spotcheck—no concerns with refs 3, 6, 8, 14, 16 or 22.

  • All of the refs have archive URL parameters aside from those from The Arizona Republic; is there a reason for this?
  • The Arizona Republic has been manually excluded from the Wayback Machine. –♠Vamí_IV†♠ 04:49, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply
  • Oh I see! A shame.
  • Ref 13 is missing a date.
  • For ref 22, I would recommend mentioning the Ecological Restoration Institute.
  • They're part of Northern Arizona University, so I'll pass on this. –♠Vamí_IV†♠ 04:49, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply
  • Noted.

Other edit

Infobox, coords, nav, cats, WP:ALT text and other templates good.

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.