Talk:Rashid Rida

Latest comment: 1 year ago by Iskandar323 in topic Formatting

Untitled edit

The link to islamic modernist is empty. Are there no islamic modernists? Make a stub for that please. - Pernambuco 06:12, 24 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

"Rida was born near Tripoli in what is now Syria..." umm...i don't know where this person was born, but syria is not near tripoli unless by "near" we mean "about 1300 miles away." —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.160.1.115 (talk) 02:20, 14 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Claim of freemasonry edit

The article quotes an assertion that Rida was a freemason. A citation is needed for this; specifically, of which lodge was he a member?

The same problem and question applies to articles on Jamal-al-Din Afghani and Muhammad `Abduh.

yoyo (talk) 16:18, 5 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Sourcing edit

The man was quite influential among Islamists. There are a lot more available sources out there which could really beef up the article. MezzoMezzo (talk) 09:33, 16 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

@User:CheckDigit1, why was a valid source removed during this edit?
Also, what's with this citation? I just checked Google Books and the info is correct, but the citatin absolutely isn't - even the author's name appear to be wrong. And where is the publisher info? Where is the ISBN number? All of this information is easily obtainable on Google Books and including it would only have taken another minute or so of your time. Check WP:CITEHOW for things which ought to be included. MezzoMezzo (talk) 05:07, 21 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

The quote was removed because it did not provide evidence that Rida was close to the Baha'i faith (though it did indicate that Abduh was). If you read the source you will find plenty of quotes that Rida was actually quite strongly opposed to Bahaism. — Preceding unsigned comment added by CheckDigit1 (talkcontribs) 12:10, 21 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

I assume you're referring to: Juan R.I. Cole. "Muhammad `Abduh and Rashid Rida: A Dialogue on the Baha'i Faith." World Order Vol. 15, nos. 3-4 (Spring/Summer 1981):7-16. Alright, perhaps it doesn't, but where did you find this source? It's a proper citation so I would like to check it out. Is it on Google Books? Do you have a PDF?
Also, what about this: Karim Wissa, “Freemasonry in Egypt 1798-1921″. The British Society for Middle Eastern Studies Bulletin, vol.16, no.2, 1989. It was sourcing the following statement: "Conversely, Rida also had a close relationship with Freemasonry." Again, the citation is proper; why did you remove the first source and accompanying information? MezzoMezzo (talk) 05:05, 22 July 2013 (UTC)Reply
Look, for the time being, I'm going to return the Wissa source per Wikipedia:Assume good faith for the time being. If we can find the time to inspect that one too then great, but right now I see no reason to remove both sources. MezzoMezzo (talk) 09:59, 27 July 2013 (UTC)Reply
I just found the Cole source here, reprinted with full permission of the author. This is an incredible source, and I really can't understand why it would be removed - just edit the text. Look, biographies of Muslim notables are already lacking in general - any reliable sources we can bring are a great help, and if someone wrote text not verified by the source, we can just rewrite the text. Removing reliable sources that relate to the subject, however, isn't helpful - we need to build up articles, not tear them down. MezzoMezzo (talk) 10:07, 27 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

Salafi and Islamic modernism edit

These two movements seem to contrast, the one oriented toward the founders of Islam, the other to modernizing Islam, yet Rashid Rida is cited as following both. Can this be clarified? HGilbert (talk) 16:46, 10 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

According to his views, he definitely wasn't a Salafi. The only reason why he is probably described as a Salafi in this Wikipedia article is people citing western writers who seem to not understand the difference.--Crazyketchupguy (talk) 14:20, 28 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Rashid Rida. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:39, 16 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Copyright problem removed edit

  Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://web.archive.org/web/20210220014044/https://www.researchgate.net/publication/229771951_Rashid_Rida%27s_Legacy. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)

For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. ƒirefly ( t · c ) 10:37, 5 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Formatting edit

This page has one of the worst formatting I've seen on this website Hellbat31 (talk) 22:12, 28 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Yep, it's pretty grim - so much so that it's hard to know where to even begin in improving it. Iskandar323 (talk) 22:23, 28 December 2022 (UTC)Reply