Talk:Raju Yadav

Latest comment: 2 years ago by 162 etc. in topic Ambiguity

Requested move 23 February 2022

edit
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: not moved. Consensus against move; does not satify WP:NCBIO. Any editor believing in the possibility of ambiguity may start a new RM with an appropriate title to move this page to. (closed by non-admin page mover) ---CX Zoom(he/him) (let's talk|contribs) 06:33, 3 March 2022 (UTC)Reply


Raju YadavRajkumar alias Raju Yadav – he goes by both, Rajkumar and Raju, so it will be better 2409:4063:6C95:DE83:B5A2:5C13:2B0F:DD86 (talk) 13:15, 23 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

This is a contested technical request (permalink). GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 15:06, 23 February 2022 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Ambiguity

edit

@162 etc. and TheBirdsShedTears: I've closed the above RM as not moved. In case you believe that the current title is ambiguous, feel free to start a new RM with an appropriate title if you want to. ---CX Zoom(he/him) (let's talk|contribs) 06:40, 3 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

I have no objection, but the proposed title was really unsupported by the Wikipedia policies. TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 07:52, 3 March 2022 (UTC)Reply
Thank you. I've retargeted Rajkumar Yadav back to Rajkummar Rao, a discussion can be started at RfD should anyone feel this is unsatisfactory. 162 etc. (talk) 01:34, 4 March 2022 (UTC)Reply