| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Untitled edit
I've removed some completely unsourced statements about accusations against Zitelmann (see also this OTRS ticket). --bainer (talk) 04:33, 5 May 2006 (UTC)
Zitelmann's thesis are very controversial edit
Zitelmann's thesis are in dispute with most historians about these issues. He is often accused of being an extremist of the right wing. Do you need references for this? Just read one of the many book reviews about his book "Hitler: Selbstverständnis eines Revolutionärs". —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.70.6.215 (talk) 16:57, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
Recent edit edit
Preserving here by providing this link; pls see edit summary for rationale. K.e.coffman (talk) 02:31, 17 February 2018 (UTC)