Talk:Rainbow Beach, Queensland

Latest comment: 4 years ago by IamNotU in topic Copyright problem removed

Copyright problem removed edit

  Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://www.smh.com.au/lifestyle/rainbow-beach-20040208-gdkqgv.html and http://www.visitrainbowbeach.com.au/our-rainbow-beach/rainbow-beach/rainbow-beach-history.html. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)

For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. IamNotU (talk) 22:51, 15 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

In this edit: [1], I removed unsourced material added on 6 July 2013, in edit Special:Diff/557495655/563080288, from the "History" section. It was copypasted by a user with a pattern of copyright violations. The first two paragraphs seem to originate in the 2004 Sydney Morning Herald article, though that same text is found on the Rainbow Beach Commerce and Tourism Association website. That website additionally has the second two paragraphs. The archive.org site only has archives for that page going back to 2017, so according to that it could be possible that the text was copied from Wikipedia to there. However it's unlikely that the user copypasted text from the Herald site, then added their own original text after that, and much more likely that the Rainbow Beach tourism page existed before the edit, and the whole thing was copied from it. Furthermore, the user appears to be the same person as now-blocked JohnLickor372 (talk · contribs), who has an extensive history of copyright violations, and in my experience has a poor command of English and is not capable of writing the text in question. The whole edit should be assumed to be a copyright violation. --IamNotU (talk) 22:51, 15 September 2019 (UTC)Reply