Talk:Railway signals in Germany
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | Railway signals in Germany received a peer review by Wikipedia editors, which on April 2007 was archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article. |
Assessment edit
This is the main article on a key aspect of German railway operations and safety.
Flashing edit
I would like to replace most (if not all) occurrances of "flashing" by "blinking" (of a traffic signal, not the blink of the human eye), because "flashing" infers a higher speed of changes, to my understanding. Especially these: Ks1, Zs8, Hl distant aspects. --Mopskatze (talk) 02:00, 6 October 2013 (UTC) P.S.: very nice article!
External links modified edit
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on German railway signalling. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131111232746/http://fahrweg.dbnetze.com/file/2360844/data/rw_483_0101A01.pdf to http://fahrweg.dbnetze.com/file/2360844/data/rw_483_0101A01.pdf
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131111232906/http://fahrweg.dbnetze.com/file/2360842/data/rw_483_0101.pdf to http://fahrweg.dbnetze.com/file/2360842/data/rw_483_0101.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:47, 11 January 2017 (UTC)
Comparison to UK Signalling edit
@Kirbanzo: As I said in my edit summary, there is no source given in the article to support the statement that "UK signalling seems to be similar to the Ks system at first sight." (in fact, the whole article has a significant lack of sources for its length, but that's another matter). WP:Verifiability requires that all information in an article be verifiable, that is that they are attributable to a WP:Reliable source, especially for opinions, as is the case here. Failing a source which directly supports the statement "UK signalling is similar to German signalling in some way which warrants special mention", then the content in the article appears to be an editor's conclusion. Although not unreasonable, that's not how Wikipedia works. As such, unless a source can be provided for this comparison, I shall be removing this section promptly.
On a side note, the whole "Comparison" section has no source... 107.190.33.254 (talk) 21:27, 3 October 2018 (UTC)