Talk:Railway nationalisation
Latest comment: 6 years ago by Absolutelypuremilk in topic the mention of Southern
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Railway nationalisation article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
the mention of Southern edit
Southern is mentions about how the serves are not good but do we really need to know that? Wkc19 :) (talk) 21:19, 17 June 2017 (UTC)
- I agree, there have been lots of UK rail companies since privatisation, doesn't make sense to focus on one in particular. Absolutelypuremilk (talk) 08:00, 18 June 2017 (UTC)