Talk:Rag Doll (character)

Add pictures, please.

What parts were removed because the "bother"? His vermiform appendix? ZPS102 16:37, 26 May 2006 (UTC)

Ragdoll or Rag Doll

I thought I had it right, but I'm not sure now. Most the links I looked at about the DC comics used Rag Doll, but it looks the "The Batman" has Ragdoll. Some of you experts out there might want to provide some guidance (before I finish changing links to Ragdoll (comics). I got here because I discovered Rag Doll was a minor version of Ragdoll (comics) plus some added sentences about other uses of the two words. I've converted Rag Doll to a dab page and was wondering what to do. If I don't hear, I plan to continue changing links to Ragdoll (comics) to Rag Doll (comics), but I am less certain this would be the right thing to do in all circumstances. John (Jwy) 07:08, 2 June 2006 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Parademon5.jpg

Image:Parademon5.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 17:14, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:RagDoll1.jpg

Image:RagDoll1.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 04:02, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:RagDoll2.JPG

Image:RagDoll2.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 04:02, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:RagDollWW.jpg

Image:RagDollWW.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 04:02, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:RagdollAnimated.jpg

Image:RagdollAnimated.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 04:03, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

Split

The split suggestion has been up since August 2007 so it is about time we started the discussion.

The idea of splitting the new Rag Doll off seem reasonable as his origin is different and it seems a bit clunky to have him tagged on the end here. The main problem seems to be that we don't know his name so can't disambiguate the entry the way we usually do: "Rag Doll (?? Merkel)". I will recheck the stories and it might be the name has come out somewhere but we may be able to come up with some kind of solution. (Emperor (talk) 14:22, 9 July 2008 (UTC))

If we are to split, it may be best to go along the lines of Atom — split the senior Merkel out and leave the "pretender" and the son here. - J Greb (talk) 22:07, 9 July 2008 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Rag Doll (comics). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050914022941/http://my.execpc.com/~icicle/RAGDOLL.html to http://my.execpc.com/~icicle/RAGDOLL.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061012052128/http://www.legionsofgotham.org/BIOSragdoll.html to http://www.legionsofgotham.org/BIOSragdoll.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060713064015/http://www.legionsofgotham.org/BATMANcharacterindexBad.html to http://www.legionsofgotham.org/BATMANcharacterindexBad.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120406062951/http://www.monitorduty.com/2005/12/alan-kistlers-profile-on-the-flash-part-1/ to http://www.monitorduty.com/2005/12/alan-kistlers-profile-on-the-flash-part-1/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:16, 2 January 2018 (UTC)