Talk:Radiant Child: The Story of Young Artist Jean-Michel Basquiat
Latest comment: 5 years ago by Snowycats in topic GA Review
 | Radiant Child: The Story of Young Artist Jean-Michel Basquiat has been listed as one of the Language and literature good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: December 28, 2018. (Reviewed version). |
 | A fact from Radiant Child: The Story of Young Artist Jean-Michel Basquiat appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 12 May 2018 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
 | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
GA Review edit
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Radiant Child: The Story of Young Artist Jean-Michel Basquiat/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Snowycats (talk · contribs) 05:43, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
I will be reviewing this article. This article seems to be a strong candidate. The following will be updated as I go along.
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
- Is it well written?
- A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
- B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
- A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
- Is it verifiable with no original research?
- A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
- B. All in-line citations are from reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines:
- C. It contains no original research:
- D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
- A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
- B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
- A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
- Is it neutral?
- It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
- It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
- Is it stable?
- It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
- It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
- Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Pass or Fail:
This review will be completed shortly. Thanks! Awaiting the addition of a conception section, before giving a final pass.
Wonderful incorporation of sourcing and adding a Conception section! Great job @Barkeep49: for bringing it home with this one. I believe at this time, the article fulfills all GA criteria!