Wikipedia

Talk:Rachelle Ann Go/Archive 1

< Talk:Rachelle Ann Go
Latest comment: 1 year ago by 2A00:23C6:7E00:B301:BD1D:1AAF:6AA4:74DF in topic Reads like a fan page 📄
Archive 1

Chinese descent

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I think it's more accurate to specify that she's part Chinese rather than of Chinese descent. She's only a quarter Chinese

Indeed. I found her out after reading this: http://www.chinahistoryforum.com/topic/9779-chinese-in-the-philippines/page-4 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.53.118.17 (talk) 00:49, 3 November 2014 (UTC)

Surgery?

Latest comment: 17 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

This is a serious question and one that is about her career. Did she underwent breast enlargement surgery? My brother noticed how she changed her image to being sexier. He also noticed how her breasts got larger. Moonwalkerwiz 07:01, 2 December 2006 (UTC)


What is the connection between her singing career and her breasts?! Please be respectful of people. But just to answer your question, no she did not have breast augmentation. You can try looking up her official photo in Search for A Star and you'll see that nothing has changed. Rebnin 10:30, 3 May 2007 (UTC)

Trashed

Latest comment: 17 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

Who the heck's been trashing this girl's article? The nerve of some uneducated people. I had quite a hard time cleaning up, and I'm not even certain if I've completely cleaned up the mess. Would someone double-check it for me? Someone needs to monitor this article for any further bashing. mark_c08 06:08, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

sino po bang nag e-edit palagi ng profile ni shin napaka wala naman pong pinag aralan nung person na gumagawa po nito, please itigil na po ang pag baboy sa profile ni shin

You can trace the user and/or the IP address (for anonymous users) of whoever vandalizes Shin's article by clicking on the "History" tab on the top of the article. This happens often in Wikipedia, so don't worry too much about the vandals, you can revert (or undo) the vandalisms every now and then (you may notice that I do this often). However, if the pages becomes too heavily vandalized (for example, too many vandalisms within 24 hours), we can request an admin to protect this page. Just leave me a message in my talk page and I will personally make this request. --- Tito Pao 12:12, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

This is good to hear. I do not know why there are people who are so bent on spreading false information on Rachelle even in respectable sites like wikipedia. I guess it just goes to show that there are people who want to bring her down no matter what. I can only guess why. Rebnin 10:32, 3 May 2007 (UTC)

kala ko 5x platinum na ang I Care album bakit gold uli ang nakaregister dito?

Fair use rationale for Image:Cd 01go.jpg

Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 

Image:Cd 01go.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:41, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

what is the highest notes of ms.rachelle ann go??

Fair use rationale for Image:Yogloria01.jpg

Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 

Image:Yogloria01.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 11:58, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

VOCAL PROFILE

Can someone put a citation on her vocal profile? Because I remember it being 3.3 only and now it went up to 4. I just want to have the source of this information.


vocal range: 3.625

highest note: C7 proof: watch on you tube "rachelle ann go whistle"

lowest note: E3 proof: watch any of her you tube videos

Edit summary Sept 13 08

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

This article has loads of POV and questionable claims (i.e. "powerful control of the whistle register", "undeniable vocal ability"). Seriously, Mariah Carey doesn't even get "powerful control of the whistle register" mentioned in her article lol. And Rachelle's whistle register is still...unpolished to say the least. (IMO) I removed some of the more um...'extreme' claims (for lack of a better word that i can come up with now -.-)

She obviously has a powerful voice so she doesn't need this.

This article needs major clean-up and a little rewording here and there. Some parts sounded like they were thought up by my 4th grade English teacher, which isn't really a top priority but Filipinisms like "she is a talent of VIVA..." should be subject to rewording. The context in which the word 'talent' is used here would seem odd and probably incorrect to some.

UnkEdit (talk) 14:30, 13 September 2008 (UTC)

Love Life

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Are her romantic relationships really pertinent to the overall article? Unless there was a lot of coverage in the Philippines about her love life (and I wouldn't know because I live in the US), I really don't think it's appropriate to mention anything about it in this article. Also, there's some grammatical mistakes that I noticed. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.26.188.254 (talk) 18:30, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

I believe that her break up with christian bautista really made a critical reaction to her career. There are coverages in the buzz, boy n kris even in gma 7 (master showman & unang hirit) about her and christian and comparing her impact when she was with christian & now that she is in a relationship with the son of gary v, She was really in her glory days when she was with christian, if you would notice her singles now are hard to peak and even they don't stay long in charts unlike the singles back then would really debut in top ten or higher.

Also in Myx Music Awards, the CF-ShinIan-Shinatic text brigade is gone that's why Rachelle's tally is lower than expected.

Albums

Latest comment: 14 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Falling In Love hasn't even reach Gold. There are no reliable sources that it reached 2x platinum. Rachelle Ann Go self titled album is just only 2x platinum. Please don't declare false album status just to uplift the albums. 5 times platinum for Go's I Care album? it's good if she reached that status but can anybody show a proof? i thought it didn't even reach platinum. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 167.7.193.8 (talk) 06:05, 22 July 2009 (UTC)

somebody keeps on editing the album status of falling in love and obsession, please do give reliable proofs, specifically, the official announcement of VIVA Records, that Go's 5th album is Officially Gold. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 119.94.226.159 (talk) 15:08, 15 October 2009 (UTC)

External links modified

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Rachelle Ann Go. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:22, 12 November 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Rachelle Ann Go. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:59, 31 December 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Rachelle Ann Go. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:33, 12 January 2018 (UTC)

Reads like a fan page 📄

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Career section is too long and reads like a fan page 2A00:23C6:7E00:B301:BD1D:1AAF:6AA4:74DF (talk) 01:10, 28 April 2023 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Rachelle_Ann_Go/Archive_1&oldid=1212857458"