 | A fact from Rachel Whitear appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 21 November 2005. The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
Fair use rationale for Image:Rachel Whitear alive.jpg edit
Image:Rachel Whitear alive.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 04:09, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
Foetal position edit
Didn't one of the autopsies find that she was placed in the foetal position after she had died, to make it look like an overdose? This would tie up with the toxicology —Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.103.163.11 (talk) 16:26, 19 June 2010 (UTC)
Toxicology edit
I'm a little confused -- the page talks about the toxicology result finding heroin in her bloodstream, but looking for heroin, specifically, is very unusual in a toxicology lab. Every lab I've ever heard of will search for morphine and/or 6-monoacetylmorphine. I've never even heard of a lab that tests postmortem blood for heroin.
Also, I question the number (0.15 micrograms/Liter) given as a fatal blood concentration. As far as I've ever seen (and according to Baselt), there is no such thing as an established fatal concentration of heroin. It is also very difficult to establish a fatal concentration of morphine, as individual tolerance can play an enormous part -- a concentration that would be ten times the fatal level for one individual may be a steady-state concentration for a hardcore user.
Thirdly, if the result given in this article is for morphine (and not heroin), then it is important to distinguish whether the concentration is for unbound morphine, or whether the result includes morphine-glucoronide as well (total morphine). Concentrations of the latter can be more than an order of magnitude higher than the concentration of unbound morphine alone. 206.194.127.112 (talk) 22:17, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
- 206.194.127.112 uses "0.15 micrograms/Liter". This might be a mistake for "milliliter". — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.97.194.200 (talk) 13:35, 3 November 2011 (UTC)