Talk:Race for Your Life, Charlie Brown

Latest comment: 3 years ago by 96.27.252.150 in topic No mention?

No mention? edit

  • No mention of the screw-ups in continuity? There are two points in the movie where the weather suddenly changes from summer weather to winter weather. I understand that it takes place in the wilds of Oregon, but isn't this a little too extreme? Eyeball kid (talk) 04:03, 7 May 2008 (UTC)Reply
Nah, I think that'd be something for IMDB to do. BTW if it seems like I do a lot of disruptive editing, that's just the idiots at my school. I'm not the one doing those. 96.27.252.150 (talk) 01:37, 14 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

I don't remember it being rated PG. edit

I agree that the part about this movie being rated PG is erroneous. I was ten years old when this movie was released, and I remember the commercials. My memory isn't the world's best, I think I would have remembered if a "Peanuts" film was rated PG. Besides, I checked out the link on YouTube cited in the previous post. That's the commercial I remember, and it definitely says the movie was rated G. Unless the editors of Wikipedia can provide proof to the contrary, that section in the article should be changed.97.73.64.165 (talk) 01:34, 2 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

I might also point out that the editors of this article provide no documentation for the claim that the film was originally rated "PG." Doesn't this violate Wikipedia's policy?67.233.88.132 (talk) 20:28, 9 December 2009 (UTC)Reply
The scenes described in the article that supposedly gave the film its supposed PG rating are ridiculous. Disney's The Rescuers and Pete's Dragon released the same year had far darker and more frightening content than all of the "Peanuts" films combined. The claim that this is regarded as the "darkest" Peanuts film is silly on its own, since the one that followed, Bon Voyage, Charlie Brown (and Don't Come Back!) (1980) is far darker and more sinister. I'm going to go ahead and remove all of these claims with the right that grants their improbability, as well as the lack of sources. T.W. (talk) 17:41, 18 March 2010 (UTC)Reply