Talk:Rabiosa (song)/GA2

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Prism (talk · contribs) 19:43, 25 December 2013 (UTC)

General

• Disambiguation links: Not present.
• Checklinks: Correct one external link.

Corrected. --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 14:37, 27 December 2013 (UTC)

There's another one. Prism △ 12:42, 28 December 2013 (UTC)

Hmm.. there seems to be something very wrong with the AMPROFON site. I have now added an archive link to let it open correctly. --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 13:01, 28 December 2013 (UTC)

• Original research: Not present.
• References: Reference number 46 has Ryan Seacrest misspelled.

I just saw that. Corrected. --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 14:39, 27 December 2013 (UTC)

In depth

1. Background and composition

• I'll allow the use of PopCrush, just because it's used in some Rihanna GA's, but it was recently removed from one of my articles by another user. A tip: try to avoid that website.

Thanks for the tip. Actually I used it since PopCrush is basically just reviewing the song, which even a blog user can do (but we can't use them). I never use that site to verify something like release dates, charts and all factual info. --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 14:37, 27 December 2013 (UTC)

• Keep the PopCrush reference at the end of the paragraph and remove all instances that follow reference 10.

I have been told by a reviewer that if a sentence uses quotes then a ref must follow it. However, if you insist I can do the changes. --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 14:37, 27 December 2013 (UTC)

Keep it then. Prism △ 12:42, 28 December 2013 (UTC)

6. Certifications

• Merge into Charts.

Merged. --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 14:37, 27 December 2013 (UTC)

Final comments

• Again, a great read and easily one of your best works. I almost didn't have to do any corrections! Keep up the good work. Prism △ 19:43, 25 December 2013 (UTC)

Thank you! This is this page's second GA review as an other user had nominated it before and it got quickfailed. So I decided to improve it so such an extent that a quickfail is miles away :P Thank you so much! --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 14:37, 27 December 2013 (UTC)

Passing, good work! Prism △ 13:08, 28 December 2013 (UTC)

Thanks! --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 13:14, 28 December 2013 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.