Talk:Rabbit Junk
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
What? edit
I wouldn't even say it's a one man project. There is a band now. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.174.59.196 (talk) 01:17, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
Restoration edit
Restored the article - not the original because it was deleted. The artist is certainly of note due to the availability of products (Amazon UK, iTunes, etc), and due to earlier band The Shizit.) Kamikaze Deadboy (talk) 12:54, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
Notability edit
Rabbit Junk meets the following 'notability' guidelines 1. Publication in non-trivial, non-directly related source(s) - Which were referenced several times in previous updates - I don't understand why those were 'reverted' away. 5. Released 2(coming on 3) Albums on an 'important' indie label (Full Effect Records, and glitchmode recordings) 6. Head musician (JP Anderson) is related to other notable bands (The Shizit)
-Chris A. April 10th, 2008 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.58.136.84 (talk • contribs)
- Where are the citations? The current article is full of unfootnoted assertions and fan-site language. Have you read, much less followed, WP:CITE, to see how they should be formatted? All there was was a bunch of inappropriate links to websites, most of which had to be removed. Nobody's calling you a liar; but you've got to back up your claims. (And sign your posts.) --Orange Mike | Talk 02:58, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
Removal of 3 and a half year old issues box edit
Would it be safe to take that down now? It definitely seems to have met the notability requirement and has had significant rewriting and restructuring in the time since June 2012. It feels like it would be safe to get rid of that now. VampireKilla (talk) 16:07, 13 February 2016 (UTC)