Talk:Queen Alexandra's birdwing

Status

Aren't the Queen Alexandra's endangered? Im not quite sure. -- IvanTortuga 20:02, 29 August 2007 (UTC) yes i looked it up -tasha —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.113.70.63 (talk) 01:53, 18 February 2010 (UTC)

Wrong picture

While I'm no Ornithoptera expert, I'm quite sure that the pictured species is not O. alexandrae. Definite pictures of the species, both male and female, can be found here – and very close to natural size BTW; a touch larger perhaps. Looks more like O. goliath (picture) to me, though I'm rather oblivious to all possible confusion species. These too seem to be close to natural size, but the text seems to have the sexes confused (the picture's got it right) . --Anshelm '77 02:12, 22 July 2006 (UTC)

i have had similar thoughts. I don't think too that this is O. alexandrae. --Melly42 08:20, 22 July 2006 (UTC)

Well, the new picture likely has the right species. But like I said I'm no expert. --Anshelm '77 20:50, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

Behavior Section

While this article is informative, it is not as well organized as it could be and should have a separate Behavior subsection. While the information on the adults mating behaviors is well detailed, it should be moved to this new section rather than be under the biology heading. It should also include feeding, defense, and migration patterns (if any). Also, the second paragraph under larva should be moved to a behavior section as well. Overall, there is good information but it is poorly organized. Alexandra.payne (talk) 03:02, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

Poisonous?

Check this link [1]

don't believe any hokum you read. the caterpillars feed on poisonous plants but that don't mean that they make this butterfly poisonous --Melly42 (talk) 07:41, 25 June 2009 (UTC)only poison to predators who eat them

Move to Queen Alexandra's birdwing

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved per request. Favonian (talk) 19:29, 28 August 2012 (UTC)

Missing General Categories

This article is strong in analyzing the biology of the butterfly, having four different subsections for the biology. However, they are missing categories such as behavior, mating, and diet. These are basic information about the species that would be useful to know in understanding the species in greater depth. For the behavior, it would be beneficial to know how the daily schedule or tasks of the birdwing look, for the mating, different species mate differently and have different courting styles, and for diet, each species has a specific diet. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sjwang312 (talk • contribs) 20:17, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

---

Ornithoptera alexandrae → Queen Alexandra's birdwing –

Reason WP:COMMONNAME Relisted. Favonian (talk) 18:33, 21 August 2012 (UTC). Chrisrus (talk) 06:48, 14 August 2012 (UTC)

• Support Textbook common name, in the original zoological sense. Cheers, Zaldax (talk) 18:52, 23 August 2012 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Queen Alexandra's birdwing. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20111030102732/http://peabody.research.yale.edu:80/jls/pdfs/1970s/1971/1971-25(1)58-Straatman.pdf to http://peabody.research.yale.edu/jls/pdfs/1970s/1971/1971-25%281%2958-Straatman.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:10, 20 July 2016 (UTC)