Talk:Pyla

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Pyla. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141016191920/http://www.cystat.gov.cy/mof/cystat/statistics.nsf/All/7F6BB26ED9D00A00C2257AD90055542A/$file/POP_CEN_11-POP_PLACE_RESID-EN-170414.xls?OpenElement to http://www.cystat.gov.cy/mof/cystat/statistics.nsf/All/7F6BB26ED9D00A00C2257AD90055542A/$file/POP_CEN_11-POP_PLACE_RESID-EN-170414.xls?OpenElement
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081015025759/http://www.unficyp.org/nqcontent.cfm?a_id=1416&tt=graphic&lang=l1 to http://www.unficyp.org/nqcontent.cfm?a_id=1416&tt=graphic&lang=l1

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:23, 4 December 2017 (UTC)

Origin of the Pyla name

With no source offered, the claim made in the phrase "The name of the village is Greek which leads to the assumption that the village existed during the Byzantine years." is dubious at best. The majority of the island speaks Greek and has done so for millennia, possibly since Mycenaean times (1600-1100 BC). One cannot reasonably assume that just because Pyla is a Greek name with Greek roots that it traces itself to "the Byzantine years". If we only make a guess based on the name it could literally trace itself to any point over the last 3+ millenia. In any case though, this is Wikipedia, we must collect information from reliable sources; we cannot write stuff based on editors' guesses. No reference is provided for the above claim and due to the dubious reasoning used it does seem like original research (as was already indicated by another editor). For this reason, I'm considering editing out the phrase altogether. Thoughts?

Is Pyla really the only mixed village?

The demographic part on Cyprus’ page states that there are two villages with mixed greek/turk, Pyla and Rizokarpaso.

Yet, on Pyla’s page it’s said " The village is special in the respect that it is the only settlement in Cyprus still inhabited by both its original Greek Cypriot and Turkish Cypriotinhabitants."

So, is this text wrong, or is the Cyprus’ page wrong? Because one says there is only one and the other says there are two. 74.14.182.92 (talk) 04:59, 8 September 2023 (UTC)