Talk:Puncheon Run Connector/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Rschen7754 (talk · contribs) 04:25, 24 July 2012 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

• What is a surface intersection?
  • Reworded. Dough4872 19:01, 24 July 2012 (UTC)
• "development" - either be more specific, or remove it entirely.
  • Clarified. Dough4872 19:01, 24 July 2012 (UTC)
• What does DelDOT stand for?
  • Defined abbreviation. Dough4872 19:01, 24 July 2012 (UTC)
• What about the city of Dover not liking the proposal? That seems significant, doesn't it?
  • Added. Dough4872 19:01, 24 July 2012 (UTC)
• Not a requirement for GA, but the picture is a bit dark.

On hold. --Rschen7754 05:17, 24 July 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for the review, I have replied to the above comments. Dough4872 19:01, 24 July 2012 (UTC)

Passing. --Rschen7754 20:05, 24 July 2012 (UTC)